The table below compares the main features of these printers. Interestingly, the Epson and Canon models are relatively recent releases, while the HP model has been around for several years and the company shows no signs of updating it. The A2 desktop printer category is relatively small with only four models for photographers to choose from (although earlier models from Canon and Epson may still be available). However, when you’ve paid more than $2000, you might expect sturdier build in these areas. To some degree, these compromises are a consequence of keeping the printer’s weight down. The rear paper support guides, which pull up behind the Auto Sheet Feeder, also feel rather thin and insecure for handling large sheets of paper so it’s good to have more solid and substantial front and rear feeders as alternatives. The flip-down front panel, which becomes a pull-out paper catching tray, also feels quite insubstantial and its push-release mechanism often needs a few nudges to engage and disengage. Our main criticism in the ‘build’ department is the relatively flimsy paper support ‘trays’. The body of the printer is very solidly constructed and it is quite heavy (19.8 kg) for a desktop unit – although considerably lighter than its ‘big brother’ the Stylus Pro 4880.

(Source: Epson.)īuild quality is similar to the 3800 model.

Front view of the Stylus Pro 3880 with output tray extended.

Epson pro 3880 printer